Logo
Builders' Plan Gallery  |  Hip Pocket Web Site  |  Contact Forum Admin  |  Contact Global Moderator
September 24, 2018, 11:32:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with email, password and session length
 
Home Help Search Login Register
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Top flite P51 - retracts  (Read 559 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kwikfly
Copper Member
**

Kudos: 0
Offline Offline

Belgium Belgium

Posts: 4

Topic starter


Ignore
« on: April 26, 2018, 02:53:36 PM »


Good morning all,
My 65" Top Flite P51 is almost finished now, the maiden flight should happen in the next week or three. But I'm getting a bit apprehensive. I built it with Robart pneumatic retracts, and Robostruts (653). These beauties absorb shocks in line with the gear very wel, but not laterally.... See my topic on the Graupner Monsun, it has a noseleg with a shockabsorber just like a robostrut, but fixed with a 6mm steel pin. You don't wanna know how often I had to replace this rod (think I already used 3ft), as every time it hits a grass knot it just bends or breaks. Now on my P51 the Robostrut goes straight into the retract unit, no steel pin. I'm afraid that on any landing that is not a perfect 3-pointer the legs will just break off and rip the wing to pieces, as there is no way to absorb the energy when the leg hits an obstacle face on! I consider fixing the retracts with nylon bolts, but then won't they break off on every landing?This is my first warbird, should I just keep it as static display? Any advice/hints/tips from you experienced guys? Please help!
Cheers, Kwikfly
Logged
flyerinokc
Bronze Member
***

Kudos: 0
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 22


3rd Rate Hack Builder at your service!



Ignore
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2018, 03:38:24 PM »

In my opinion and only in my opinion I would try switching from a grass field to hard surface landing strip. You will find you will be a lot less likely to damage your struts. Short of a golf course green or a field properly prepared with model flying usage, you won't find a grass field without some obstacles. The Robart 653 is intended for up to a 5.45 Kilo airplane so you must be building the .60 size airplane.  Think about it your gear is 1/7th scale, if you took the stones, lumps, bumps, etc. found in the field you are using and blew them up to 7 times their current size a full size Mustang's gear probably wouldn't be happy either. If you have the flying experience, and have done a little research on how this model flies and you can find a paved surface strip I think you will be very satisfied with your model.   

Mike
Logged

Known menace to aerial navigation
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!